PMC Pilot
Website language
Menu
XLSX /

AI tools and documents for engineering and project management.

Risk Probability and Impact Matrix

Provide a blank five-by-five map for agreed probability and impact levels and their risk bands.

How to use this template

This Excel template contains prepared working sheets and completion notes on a separate sheet. Enter your project data and review the completed workbook before use.

The form prepares a separate brief; it does not fill the Word or Excel file.

Read product descriptions in your language. The Word and Excel template files are in English.

Selected page preview · XLSX

Only selected pages are shown. This is not the complete template. The full editable Word or Excel file is supplied with purchase.

Learning

How to use this template

When you need it

Use this matrix after probability and impact criteria are defined, when the project needs a common visual structure for combining assessed likelihood and consequence levels into relative risk-priority categories.

What it helps you decide

It supports consistent prioritization across risks assessed under the same conventions, helping reviewers compare attention needs while retaining the underlying scenario, evidence, and exceptional impacts that a matrix cell cannot explain alone.

How to complete it

  1. Confirm the approved likelihood and impact definitions before populating Likelihood / impact and the I1 through I5 columns with the intended project rating structure.
  2. Check that the matrix orientation and each impact column match the adopted criteria, including how combined or exceptional consequences are handled outside simple cell selection.
  3. Use the matrix alongside the actual risk records, reviewing inconsistent ratings and documenting any authorized interpretation changes through the project's risk-management arrangements before wider application.

Who prepares and reviews it

A risk specialist normally configures the matrix with project controls and objective-specific experts. The authorized governance role approves the rating conventions, while risk owners apply them and reviewers challenge unsupported or inconsistent assessments.

A mistake to avoid

Treating a coloured matrix cell as a quantified probability or loss estimate gives the rating a precision that the underlying qualitative assessment does not support.

Illustrative example

Illustrative example: a civil project compares uncertain ground conditions with a possible equipment-delivery delay using the same approved scales. The matrix helps identify relative attention needs, but the review also examines the ground scenario's evidence and consequence boundaries before deciding whether specialist investigation is required.

Explore the wider topic

Document contents

  • Likelihood / impact
  • I1
  • I2
  • I3
  • I4
  • I5

Required inputs

  • Project name, location, company, document number and revision
  • Actual project scope, source records and responsible roles

Practical tools.
Professional judgment.

Confirm the adopted edition, local amendments, National Annex where relevant, and contract requirements.

Prepare project brief