This Word template contains prepared headings, tables, project fields and completion notes. Add your information, review the completed document and remove the notes before issue.
The form prepares a separate brief; it does not fill the Word or Excel file.
Read product descriptions in your language. The Word and Excel template files are in English.
Selected page preview · DOCX
Only selected pages are shown. This is not the complete template. The full editable Word or Excel file is supplied with purchase.
Learning
How to use this template
When you need it
Use this draft after an incident has been reported and the authorized investigation process is established. Build it from preserved records and attributable accounts while evidence is collected, reviewed and distinguished from early hypotheses.
What it helps you decide
It organizes a defensible chronology and makes uncertainty visible. Investigators can test explanations and plan further enquiries without prematurely settling on a cause or confusing an action proposal with an approved finding.
How to complete it
Confirm the investigation scope and confidentiality requirements, then assemble dated notifications, preserved records and witness accounts with their source and time information clearly identified.
Separate established facts from uncertainty or hypotheses, build the chronology and record further enquiries needed to test causal explanations against the available evidence.
Develop proposed actions for review, retain limitations and conflicting evidence, and submit findings through the appointed investigation authority before representing any cause as finally determined.
Who prepares and reviews it
The appointed investigation lead coordinates evidence holders, witnesses and relevant technical or HSE specialists. Authorized reviewers assess conclusions; confidentiality, notification and approval responsibilities follow the actual investigation mandate and applicable arrangements.
A mistake to avoid
Do not rewrite witness accounts into a single certain narrative when evidence conflicts; preserve provenance and uncertainty so the investigation can test competing explanations.
Illustrative example
Illustrative example: equipment stops unexpectedly during a lifting operation. The draft records the event sequence, operator account and available equipment information without assigning blame. Investigators identify missing technical evidence and commission its review before determining causes and recommending approved corrective actions.