Drawing and Design Submittal Review

Review a controlled design submittal for scope, interfaces, source compliance, revision and comments.

This Word template contains prepared headings, tables, project fields and completion notes. Add your information, review the completed document and remove the notes before issue.

Prepare project brief

The form prepares a separate brief; it does not fill the Word or Excel file.

Read product descriptions in your language. The Word and Excel template files are in English.

Drawing and Design Submittal Review · Document preview — Selected page preview · DOCX

Learning

How to use this template

When you need it

Use this review when a controlled drawing or design package is formally submitted for assessment. Confirm its purpose and review scope first, particularly when earlier comments, related disciplines or interface drawings affect the package's interpretation.

What it helps you decide

It links observations to the exact submission and applicable design basis. The originator receives clear response requirements, while the project retains evidence of what was reviewed and the resulting authorized disposition.

How to complete it

Identify the submitted package and transmittal, checking drawing revisions against the review scope, applicable design basis, interface drawings and any relevant prior review comments.
Record observations by sheet or detail with their requirement sources, then state the response needed without extending the review into unsupported approval of unexamined matters.
Review responses or revised information as required, record the designated reviewer's disposition and retain the project record defining the submission's actual reviewed scope and status.

Who prepares and reviews it

The assigned discipline reviewer examines the package with interface specialists as needed. The design coordinator controls comments and routing; review codes and their contractual effects depend on the actual project arrangements.

A mistake to avoid

Do not assume a review stamp transfers design responsibility or approves every aspect of the package; interpretation depends on the actual review scope and contract.

Illustrative example

Illustrative example: a structural submittal includes a revised penetration detail but unchanged services drawings. The review records the interface inconsistency and requested response. The coordinator obtains aligned information before the responsible reviewer determines the package's disposition for its intended issue purpose.

Explore the wider topic

Document contents

Submission identity
Review observations
Response requirements
Review disposition
Project records
Preparation, review and approval

Required inputs

Submitted drawing package and transmittal
Applicable design basis and interface drawings
Review scope and prior comments

Practical tools.
Professional judgment.

Confirm the adopted edition, local amendments, National Annex where relevant, and contract requirements.